Cauchy-Riemann Equations


This page has been identified as a candidate for refactoring of advanced complexity.
In particular: The content of the exposition has basically been extracted into a definition page. Hence the emphasis of this page is to be changed so as to establiush the equivalence between the definitions of a complex-differentiable function, and to establish that all these definitions -- complex-differentiable, complex analytic, holomorphic -- are in fact the same thing. Major exercise which probly won't be today.
Until this has been finished, please leave {{Refactor}} in the code.

New contributors: Refactoring is a task which is expected to be undertaken by experienced editors only.

Because of the underlying complexity of the work needed, it is recommended that you do not embark on a refactoring task until you have become familiar with the structural nature of pages of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.

To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Refactor}} from the code.


Theorem

Let $D \subseteq \C$ be an open subset of the set of complex numbers $\C$.

Let $f: D \to \C$ be a complex function on $D$.


Let $u, v: \set {\tuple {x, y} \in \R^2: x + i y = z \in D} \to \R$ be the two real-valued functions defined as:

\(\ds \map u {x, y}\) \(=\) \(\ds \map \Re {\map f z}\)
\(\ds \map v {x, y}\) \(=\) \(\ds \map \Im {\map f z}\)

where:

$\map \Re {\map f z}$ denotes the real part of $\map f z$
$\map \Im {\map f z}$ denotes the imaginary part of $\map f z$.


Then $f$ is complex-differentiable in $D$ if and only if:

$u$ and $v$ are differentiable in their entire domain

and:

The following two equations, known as the Cauchy-Riemann equations, hold for the continuous partial derivatives of $u$ and $v$:
\(\text {(1)}: \quad\) \(\ds \dfrac {\partial u} {\partial x}\) \(=\) \(\ds \dfrac {\partial v} {\partial y}\)
\(\text {(2)}: \quad\) \(\ds \dfrac {\partial u} {\partial y}\) \(=\) \(\ds -\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial x}\)


This page or section has statements made on it that ought to be extracted and proved in a Theorem page.
In particular: This relates to the final $3$rd part of this page: Cauchy-Riemann Equations/Expression of Derivative. Needs to be separated out properly.
You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by creating any appropriate Theorem pages that may be needed.
To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.


If the conditions are true, then for all $z \in D$:

$\map {f'} z = \map {\dfrac {\partial f} {\partial x} } z = -i \map {\dfrac {\partial f} {\partial y} } z$


Polar Form

The Cauchy-Riemann equations can be expressed in polar form as:

\(\text {(1)}: \quad\) \(\ds \dfrac {\partial u} {\partial r}\) \(=\) \(\ds \dfrac 1 r \dfrac {\partial v} {\partial \theta}\)
\(\text {(2)}: \quad\) \(\ds \dfrac 1 r \dfrac {\partial u} {\partial \theta}\) \(=\) \(\ds -\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial r}\)

where $z$ is expressed in exponential form as:

$z = r e^{i \theta}$


Proof

Necessary Condition

Let $z = x + i y \in D$.

The Epsilon-Function Complex Differentiability Condition shows that there exists $r \in \R_{>0}$ such that for all $t \in \map {B_r} 0 \setminus \set 0$:

$(\text a): \quad \map f {z + t} = \map f z + t \paren {\map {f'} z + \map \epsilon t}$

where:

$\map {B_r} 0$ denotes an open ball of $0$
$\epsilon: \map {B_r} 0 \setminus \set 0 \to \CC$ is a function with $\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map \epsilon t = 0$.

Define $a, b, h, k \in \R$ by $a + i b = \map {f'} z$, and $h + i k = t$.


By taking the real parts of both sides of equation $(\text a)$, it follows that:

\(\ds \map u {x + h, y + k}\) \(=\) \(\ds \map \Re {\map f z} + \map \Re {t \map {f'} z} + \map \Re {t \map \epsilon t}\) Addition of Real and Imaginary Parts
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map u {x, y} + \map \Re {h a - k b + i h b + i a k} + \map \Re {h \map \epsilon t + i k \map \epsilon t}\) Definition of Complex Multiplication
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map u {x, y} + h a - k b + h \map \Re {\map \epsilon t} + k \map \Re {i \map \epsilon t}\) Multiplication of Real and Imaginary Parts
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map u {x, y} + h \paren {a + \map \Re {\map \epsilon t} } + k \paren {-b + \map \Re {i \map \epsilon t} }\)

To find the partial derivative $\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial x}$, assume that $y$ is fixed, and let $t$ be wholly real.

Then $t = h$, and $k = 0$, so:

$\map u {x + h, y} = \map u {x, y} + h \paren {a + \map \Re {\map \epsilon h} }$

From Limits of Real and Imaginary Parts, it follows that:

$\ds \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \map \Re {\map \epsilon h} = \map \Re {\lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \map \epsilon h} = \map \Re 0 = 0$


Then the Epsilon-Function Differentiability Condition proves that:

$\map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial x} } {x, y} = a$


To find the partial derivative $\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial y}$, assume that $x$ is fixed, and let $t$ be wholly imaginary.

Then $t = i k$, and $h = 0$, so:

$\map u {x, y + k} = \map u {x, y} + k \paren {-b + \map \Re {i \map \epsilon {i k} } }$


From Limits of Real and Imaginary Parts, it follows that:

$\ds \lim_{k \mathop \to 0} \map \Re {i \map \epsilon k} = \map \Re {i \lim_{k \mathop \to 0} \map \epsilon k} = 0$


Then the Epsilon-Function Differentiability Condition proves that:

$\map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial y} } {x, y} = -b$

$\Box$


By taking the imaginary parts of both sides of equation $(\text a)$, it follows that:

\(\ds \map v {x + h, y + k}\) \(=\) \(\ds \map v {x, y} + \map \Im {h a - k b + i h b + i a k} + \map \Im {h \map \epsilon t + i k \map \epsilon t}\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map v {x, y} + h \paren {b + \map \Im {\map \epsilon t} } + k \paren {a + \map \Im {i \map \epsilon t} }\) by a similar calculation to the one above

To find the partial derivative $\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial x}$, assume that $y$ is fixed, and let $t$ be wholly real.

Then $t = h$, and $k = 0$, so:

$\map v {x + h, y} = \map v {x, y} + h \paren {b + \map \Im {\map \epsilon h} }$

A similar argument to the ones above shows that the Epsilon-Function Differentiability Condition can be applied to prove that:

$\map {\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial x} } {x, y} = b = -\map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial y} } {x, y}$

This proves the second Cauchy-Riemann equation.

To find the partial derivative $\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial y}$, assume that $x$ is fixed, and let $t$ be wholly imaginary.

Then $t = ik$, and $h = 0$, so:

$\map v {x, y + k} = \map v {x, y} + k \paren {a + \map \Im {i \map \epsilon {i k} } }$

Here, the Epsilon-Function Differentiability Condition shows that:

$\map {\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial y} } {x, y} = a = \map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial x} } {x, y}$

This proves the first Cauchy-Riemann equation.

$\Box$


From Holomorphic Function is Continuously Differentiable, it follows that $f'$ is continuous.

From Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous and Real and Imaginary Part Projections are Continuous, it follows that $\map \Re {f'}$ and $\map \Im {f'}$ are continuous.

Then all four partial derivatives are continuous, as:

\(\ds \map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial x} } {x, y}\) \(=\) \(\ds \map {\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial y} } {x, y}\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds a\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map \Re {\map {f'} z}\)

and:

\(\ds \map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial y} } {x, y}\) \(=\) \(\ds -\map {\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial x} } {x, y}\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds -b\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds -\map \Im {\map {f'} z}\)


By definition of differentiable real-valued function, it follows that $u$ and $v$ are differentiable.

$\Box$


Sufficient Condition

Suppose that the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold for $u$ and $v$ in their entire domain.

Let $h, k \in \R \setminus \set 0$, and put $t = h + i k \in \C$.

Let $\tuple {x, y} \in \R^2$ be a point in the domain of $u$ and $v$.

Put:

$a = \map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial x} } {x, y} = \map {\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial y} } {x, y}$

and:

$b = -\map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial y} } {x, y} = \map {\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial x} } {x, y}$

From the Epsilon-Function Differentiability Condition, it follows that:

$\map u {x + h, y} = \map u {x, y} + h \paren {a + \map {\epsilon_{u x} } h}$
$\map u {x, y + k} = \map u {x, y} + k \paren {-b + \map {\epsilon_{u y} } k}$
$\map v {x + h, y} = \map v {x, y} + h \paren {b + \map {\epsilon_{v x} } k}$
$\map v {x, y + k} = \map v {x, y} + k \paren {a + \map {\epsilon_{v y} } h}$

where $\epsilon_{u x}, \epsilon_{u y}, \epsilon_{v x}, \epsilon_{v y}$ are real functions that converge to $0$ as $h$ and $k$ tend to $0$.

We have by hypothesis that the partial derivatives are continuous.

Then Epsilon-Function Differentiability Condition shows that $\epsilon_{u x}, \epsilon_{u y}, \epsilon_{v x}, \epsilon_{v y}$ are continuous real functions.

With $z = x + i y$, it follows that:

\(\ds \map f {z + t}\) \(=\) \(\ds \map u {x + h, y + k} + i \map v {x + h, y + k}\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map u {x, y} + i \map v {x, y} + h \paren {a + i b + \map {\epsilon_{u x} } h + i \map {\epsilon_{v x} } h} + k \paren {i a - b + \map {\epsilon_{u y} } k + i \map {\epsilon_{v y} } k}\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map f z + t \paren {a + i b + \dfrac h t \map {\epsilon_{u x} } h + \dfrac h t i \map {\epsilon_{v x} } h - \dfrac k t i \map {\epsilon_{u y} } k + \dfrac k t \map {\epsilon_{v y} } k}\)

Now, define $\map \epsilon t$ as:

\(\ds \map \epsilon t\) \(=\) \(\ds \dfrac h t \map {\epsilon_{u x} } h + \dfrac h t i \map {\epsilon_{v x} } h - \dfrac k t i \map {\epsilon_{u y} } k + \dfrac k t \map {\epsilon_{v y} } k\)
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) \(\ds \cmod {\map \epsilon t}\) \(\le\) \(\ds \cmod {\dfrac h t \map {\epsilon_{u x} } h} + \cmod {\dfrac h t \map {\epsilon_{v x} } h} + \cmod {\dfrac k t \map {\epsilon_{u y} } k} + \cmod {\dfrac k t \map {\epsilon_{v y} } k}\) Triangle Inequality for Complex Numbers
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \cmod {\dfrac h t} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{u x} } h} + \cmod {\dfrac h t} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{v x} } h} + \cmod {\dfrac k t} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{u y} } k} + \cmod {\dfrac k t} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{v y} } k}\) Complex Modulus of Product of Complex Numbers


By Modulus Larger than Real Part and Imaginary Part:

$\cmod k \le \cmod t$

and:

$\cmod h \le \cmod t$

Hence dividing by $\cmod t$ we have:

$\cmod {\dfrac h t} \le 1$

and:

$\cmod {\dfrac k t} \le 1$

From Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous, it follows that $\map \epsilon t$ is continuous.

Thus:

\(\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \cmod {\map \epsilon t}\) \(\le\) \(\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \cmod {\dfrac h t} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{u x} } h} + \cmod {\dfrac h t} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{v x} } h}\) Combined Sum Rule for Limits of Complex Functions
\(\ds \) \(\) \(\, \ds + \, \) \(\ds \cmod {\dfrac k t} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{u y} } k} + \cmod {\dfrac k t} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{v y} } k}\)
\(\ds \) \(\le\) \(\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{u x} } h} + \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{v x} } h}\) as $\cmod {\dfrac h t} \le 1$ and $\cmod {\dfrac k t} \le 1$ from above
\(\ds \) \(\) \(\, \ds + \, \) \(\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{u y} } k} + \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \cmod {\map {\epsilon_{v y} } k}\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds 0\)


This shows that:

$\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map \epsilon t = 0$

Then the Epsilon-Function Complex Differentiability Condition shows that:

$\map {f'} x = a + i b$

$\blacksquare$


Expression of Derivative

Let $z = x + i y$.

Then:

\(\ds \map {\dfrac {\partial f} {\partial x} } z\) \(=\) \(\ds \map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial x} } {x, y} + i \map {\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial x} } {x, y}\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map \Re {\map {f'} z} + i \, \map \Im {\map {f'} z}\) from the last part of the proof for sufficient condition
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map {f'} z\)

Similarly:

\(\ds -i \map {\dfrac {\partial f} {\partial y} } z\) \(=\) \(\ds -i \paren {\map {\dfrac {\partial u} {\partial y} } {x, y} + i \map {\dfrac {\partial v} {\partial y} } {x, y} }\)
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds -i \paren {-\map \Im {\map {f'} z} + i \map \Re {\map {f'} z} }\) from the last part of the proof for sufficient condition
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \map {f'} z\)

$\blacksquare$


Source of Name

This entry was named for Augustin Louis Cauchy and Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann.


Sources

  • 1964: Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun: Handbook of Mathematical Functions ... (previous) ... (next): $3$: Elementary Analytic Methods: $3.7$ Complex Numbers and Functions: Complex Functions, Cauchy-Riemann Equations: $3.7.30$
  • 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein: Dictionary of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • 2001: Christian Berg: Kompleks funktionsteori: $\S 1.3$