Constructive Dilemma/Formulation 2

Theorem

\(\ds \paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {r \implies s}\) \(\) \(\ds \)
\(\ds p \lor r\) \(\) \(\ds \)
\(\ds \vdash \ \ \) \(\ds q \lor s\) \(\) \(\ds \)


Proof

By the tableau method of natural deduction:

$\paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {r \implies s}, p \lor r \vdash q \lor s$
Line Pool Formula Rule Depends upon Notes
1 1 $\paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {r \implies s}$ Premise (None)
2 2 $p \lor r$ Premise (None)
3 1, 2 $\paren {p \lor r} \land \paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {r \implies s}$ Rule of Conjunction: $\land \II$ 2, 1 Associativity is implicit
4 $\paren {\paren {p \lor r} \land \paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {r \implies s} } \implies \paren {q \lor s}$ Theorem Introduction (None) Constructive Dilemma: Formulation 3
5 1, 2 $q \lor s$ Modus Ponendo Ponens: $\implies \mathcal E$ 4, 3

$\blacksquare$


Sources

  • 1973: Irving M. Copi: Symbolic Logic (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $2$ Arguments Containing Compound Statements: $2.3$: Argument Forms and Truth Tables: Exercise $\text{I} \ \mathbf k.$
  • 1973: Irving M. Copi: Symbolic Logic (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $3$: The Method of Deduction: $3.1$: Formal Proof of Validity: Rules of Inference: $5.$
  • 1980: D.J. O'Connor and Betty Powell: Elementary Logic ... (previous) ... (next): $\S \text{II}$: The Logic of Statements $(2): \ 1$: Decision procedures and proofs: $3$