Identity Mapping to Coarser Topology is Continuous
Theorem
Let $S$ be a set.
Let $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$ be topologies on $S$.
That is, let $T_1 = \struct {S, \tau_1}$ and $T_2 = \struct {S, \tau_2}$ be topological spaces.
Let $I_S: \struct {S, \tau_1} \to \struct {S, \tau_2}$ denote the identity mapping on $S$:
- $\forall x \in S: \map {I_S} x = x$
Then:
- $I_S: T_1 \to T_2$ is a continuous mapping
if and only if:
- $\tau_2$ is coarser than $\tau_1$.
![]() | This page has been identified as a candidate for refactoring of basic complexity. In particular: This is getting tedious Until this has been finished, please leave {{Refactor}} in the code.
New contributors: Refactoring is a task which is expected to be undertaken by experienced editors only. Because of the underlying complexity of the work needed, it is recommended that you do not embark on a refactoring task until you have become familiar with the structural nature of pages of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Refactor}} from the code. |
Proof 1
| \(\ds \forall U \in \tau_2: \, \) | \(\ds I_S^{-1} \sqbrk U\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds \tau_1\) | Definition of Continuous Mapping (Topology) | ||||||||||
| \(\ds \leadstoandfrom \ \ \) | \(\ds \forall U \in \tau_2: \, \) | \(\ds U\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds \tau_1\) | Definition of Identity Mapping | |||||||||
| \(\ds \leadstoandfrom \ \ \) | \(\ds \tau_2\) | \(\subseteq\) | \(\ds \tau_1\) |
But $\tau_2 \subseteq \tau_1$ is the definition of $\tau_2$ being coarser than $\tau_1$.
$\blacksquare$
Proof 2
| This article needs proofreading. Please check it for mathematical errors. If you believe there are none, please remove {{Proofread}} from the code.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Proofread}} from the code. |
Sufficient Condition
Suppose:
- $I_S: T_1 \to T_2$ is a continuous mapping.
Then, by definition of everywhere continuous mapping between $\struct {S, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {S, \tau_2}$:
- $U_2 \in \tau_2 \implies I_S^{-1} \sqbrk {U_2} \in \tau_1$
where $I_S^{-1} \sqbrk {U_2}$ denotes the preimage of $U$ under $I_S$.
By Preimage of Subset under Identity Mapping, we have:
- $U_2 \in \tau_2 \implies U_2 \in \tau_1$
So:
- $\tau_2 \subseteq \tau_1$
Hence, by definition of coarser topology:
- $\tau_2$ is coarser than $\tau_1$.
$\Box$
Necessary Condition
Suppose:
- $\tau_2$ is coarser than $\tau_1$.
That is:
- $U_2 \in \tau_2 \implies U_2 \in \tau_1$
By Preimage of Subset under Identity Mapping, we have:
- $U_2 \in \tau_2 \implies I_S^{-1} \sqbrk {U_2} \in \tau_1$
where $I_S^{-1} \sqbrk {U_2}$ denotes the preimage of $U_2$ under $I_S$.
So the mapping $I_S$ is by definition, everywhere continuous mapping between $\struct {S, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {S, \tau_2}$.
Hence:
- $I_S: T_1 \to T_2$ is a continuous mapping.
$\Box$
Hence the result.
$\blacksquare$
