Modus Tollendo Tollens

Proof Rule

is a valid argument in types of logic dealing with conditionals $\implies$ and negation $\neg$.

This includes propositional logic and predicate logic, and in particular natural deduction.


Proof Rule

If we can conclude $\phi \implies \psi$, and we can also conclude $\neg \psi$, then we may infer $\neg \phi$.


Sequent Form

The can be symbolised by the sequent:

\(\ds p\) \(\implies\) \(\ds q\)
\(\ds \neg q\) \(\) \(\ds \)
\(\ds \vdash \ \ \) \(\ds \neg p\) \(\) \(\ds \)


Explanation

The can be expressed in natural language as:

If the truth of one statement implies the truth of a second, and the second is shown not to be true, then neither can the first be true.


Also known as

is also known as:


Also see

  • Definition:Conditional

The following are related argument forms:


The Rule of Transposition is conceptually similar, and can be derived from the by a simple application of the Rule of Implication.


These are classic fallacies:


Linguistic Note

is Latin for mode that by denying, denies.

The shorter form Modus Tollens means mode that denies, or method of denying.


Sources

  • 1973: Irving M. Copi: Symbolic Logic (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $2$ Arguments Containing Compound Statements: $2.3$: Argument Forms and Truth Tables
  • 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): modus tollens
  • 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): modus tollens