16

Are short-term rentals like those offered by Airbnb, Roomorama, etc legal in Singapore? There are obviously lots of listings, and Roomorama is actually headquartered in Singapore, but there's also a lot of fulmination online about “illegal vacation rentals”. However, reading the small print, while subletting Housing Development Board (HDB) public housing is clearly against the rules (fines up to S$200,000 and loss of flat!), I can't find anything about the status of private accommodation.

I'm also curious about enforcement or lack thereof, since I take it the rules were originally put in place to stop people from turning their flats into dorms, not catering to short stays of a few nights.

lambshaanxy
  • 99,971
  • 45
  • 616
  • 891

1 Answers1

12

Update: Effective 30 June 2017, renting out private property in Singapore for a period of less than three months or to someone who is not a resident is now unequivocally illegal. It's the property owner who will be in hot water, not you, but it's still not a good idea since your legal recourse as a guest if something goes wrong will be effectively zero.

This turns out to be surprisingly nuanced. In short, while officially discouraged, short-term rentals are legal, or at least not illegal, in Singapore.

The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA), the Singapore government body responsible for private housing, makes it quite clear that:

Private residential properties or their rooms within the premises should not be rented out on a short-term basis for less than 6 months on a daily/weekly/monthly basis.

And quite a few third-party sources go on to conflate this with the HDB's legal prohibition on sublets, with the URA also doing its best to blur the two. But a rather fascinating answer on Quora by James Chua, CEO of Singapore-based short-term rental company PandaBed.com, quotes his own laywers:

" ...the Guideline is not law as it is not codified in a statutory instrument. The URA, in response to a query from the public, made a statement in The Straits Times on 26 May 2012 in which it conceded that the Guideline was not a ‘ruling’, but stressed that the URA “issue[s] guidelines from time to time to provide transparency and clarity on how the URA exercises its functions under the Planning Act” ... "

And goes on to summarize:

  • Short-term renting is NOT ILLEGAL for private property
  • The popular "6-month minimum rental period" quoted widely in the press is not a law but a guideline by the URA (Leasing guideline)
  • Owners of short-term rental homes should ensure guests don't cause disturbance to the neighbourhood or they are at risk of getting in trouble with the URA
  • The URA has the authority to take action only if guest causes disturbance to the neighbourhood.

Singapore being Singapore, the URA will probably at some point "scare the monkeys by killing a chicken" and make an example of some poor Airbnb host who rented his apartment to a bunch of frat boys who terrorized the neighbours... but at least for time being, it's OK to host, and it's OK to stay with a host. Yay!

lambshaanxy
  • 99,971
  • 45
  • 616
  • 891